When we are talking to someone who disagrees with us, or holds a view that we consider dangerous, or even believes we should pass a law which we are convinced would cause serious damage, that person is not an enemy.
What if you DO have fundamentally incompatible viewpoints? The article talks about extending care and understanding to them, but what if they don't reciprocate?
The article uses the idea of "if they were dying, would you save them?" and while I would, I don't necessarily want to rely on the idea that they would do the same for me.
I like most of this, but also--
What if you DO have fundamentally incompatible viewpoints? The article talks about extending care and understanding to them, but what if they don't reciprocate?
The article uses the idea of "if they were dying, would you save them?" and while I would, I don't necessarily want to rely on the idea that they would do the same for me.